01 · Comparison
Diff the language
Compare a section against last year or against the peer set, at sentence level, so the change is visible rather than inferred.
SEC Pro+
Legal & Compliance
Every claim points back to the filing.
Compare disclosure language across peers and across years, see exactly what changed and when it changed, and export the analysis with both citations already attached.
- ¶cited to the paragraph
- 17.9Mfiling sections indexed
- 1994–as-filed history
- 0values restated after the fact
- everychange dated to a filing
- exportwith sources attached
The problem
The change matters more than the language
Any tool can show you what a company says today. The question in a diligence memo or a filing is what it used to say, when that changed, and whether the peers changed too. Both versions are filed. The diff is the finding.
What you get instead
- Language comparisondiff disclosure across peers
- Restatement trackingsee what changed and when
- Citation-ready outputexport with sources attached
- As-filed historynever quietly revised later
One change, end to end
from a redline to an exportable finding, both sides cited
-
01 · The comparison
Same issuer · FY2023 vs FY2024
or the same section across a peer set
section-aware, not a text dump
-
02 · The redline
…may terminate upon 30 days notice… → …upon 90 days notice…
what changed, at the sentence level
-
03 · The citations
10-K · FY2023 · Item 1A ¶31 → 10-K · FY2024 · Item 1A ¶34
Accession 0000320187-25-000018
Both versions, as filed
both sides carry their own reference
-
04 · The export
Into the memo with sources attached
compare cite exportnothing retyped, nothing to re-verify
What's in the solution
Four jobs this covers end to end.
02 · Change
What changed and when
Every revision dated to the filing that introduced it, so a timeline of disclosure is a matter of record.
Restatement tracking
03 · Contracts
The clause itself
Material agreements parsed to the clause — termination rights, covenants, indemnities — quoted rather than paraphrased.
Agreements
04 · Output
Citation-ready by default
Export the analysis with accession numbers and paragraph references already attached, so nobody re-verifies it by hand.
Provenance
How it lands on your desk
Same record — a different question depending on the seat.
Securities litigation
The scenario
You need to establish what a company disclosed, when it disclosed it, and what it said before — with something that stands up on the record.
SEC Pro+ProvenanceReports
How Kaleidoscope helps
- Sentence-level diff between any two filings
- Every change dated to the filing that introduced it
- As-filed text, never a later revision
- Peer comparison to show what disclosure was standard
- Export with both citations for the exhibit
Transactional & diligence
The scenario
You are reading a target's filings and contracts under a deadline and need the exceptions, not a summary of the ordinary.
AgreementsSEC Pro+M&A Intelligence
How Kaleidoscope helps
- Clause-level extraction from material agreements
- Risk factor changes year over year on the target
- Precedent language from comparable transactions
- Amendments tracked against the original agreement
- Findings exported with sources for the diligence file
Compliance & disclosure
The scenario
You are drafting this year's filing and want to know what peers said and what you said last time.
SEC Pro+ReportsAlerts
How Kaleidoscope helps
- Your own prior language beside the peer set
- Where the market moved on a given disclosure
- New language appearing across an industry
- A record of what changed and why it was changed
- Draft support that cites rather than asserts
The products
One product reads the filings; one reads the contracts; one exports the finding.
SEC Pro+
The comparison layerFull-text search and section-aware comparison across every filing, with the ability to diff the same section across years or across a peer set.
- Sentence-level diff between two filings
- Same section compared across a peer group
- As-filed text, never revised after the fact
- Paragraph reference on every result
Explore SEC Pro+ →
17.9Mfiling sections indexed
Risk factors side by side across periods — see what was added, dropped or rewritten
Agreements
The contract layerMaterial contracts parsed to the clause, so termination rights, covenants and indemnities can be compared as drafted.
- Clause text as filed, with section reference
- Amendments tracked against the original
- Comparable clauses across a set of agreements
- Conditions and termination rights side by side
Explore Agreements →
§cited to the section
Counsel — clause search across 2,000+ agreements, with a summary that quotes its source
Reports
The output layerTake the comparison out as a document with both citations already in it — HTML, Markdown or JSON.
- Citations travel with the finding
- Accession and paragraph on every quotation
- Formats that drop into a memo or a pipeline
- Nothing retyped between the tool and the file
Explore Reports →
exportsources attached
Compare & redline — two filed employment agreements blacklined, ready to export (names blurred)
Every product in this solution
Research and agreements do the work; reports get it into the file.
Full data catalog →Core platform
- SEC Pro+ Search and diff across every filing Research UI
- Agreements Contracts parsed to the clause Paper
- Reports Findings with citations attached HTML · MD · JSON
- Alerts New filings and changed language Triggers
Data layers that feed it
- SEC · Filings Every form, as filed, since 1994 Live
- Agreements Material contracts, cited to the clause Live
- Mergers Precedent from comparable transactions Live
- SEDAR Canadian disclosure on the same footing Live
- Insider Insider activity around the period Live
- News What was public and when Live
Workflow & delivery
- APIs Filing text into your own review tools REST · Bulk
- AI Chat Ask across the filings, get cited answers MCP · Chat
- Watchlists Issuers and sections that re-screen themselves Workflow
- Search Full text across every filed document UI
| How it compares | Kaleidoscope | Legal research platforms | Filing viewers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | Sentence-level diff, section aware | Full-document only | Open two tabs |
| History | As-filed, never revised later | Current version emphasised | Whatever is posted |
| Contracts | Parsed to the clause | Full text search | Full text only |
| Citation | Accession and paragraph on every quote | Case citation conventions | Manual |
| Peer analysis | Same section across a peer set | Not structured for it | Not supported |
| Export | Citations travel with the finding | Copy and paste | Copy and paste |
Why teams switch
The finding was not what the filing said. It was that the sentence had changed, and we could show exactly when.
sentence-level diffas-filed, never revisedcitations travel with the export
From the research desk
The diligence gap: four questions a strong LLM still gets wrongEvery claim, back to the filing
Talk to our team about how you work today, or start a trial and explore the platform yourself.